Comprehension and Content
- Did the presentation help the audience understand the research?
- Was the research topic and its significance communicated using language appropriate to an educated, but non-specialist audience?
Engagement and Communication
- Did the presentation make the audience want to know more about the research?
- Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background of the research question and its significance?
The judges may also consider the following factors:
- Did the presentation clearly describe the key results of the research, including conclusions and outcomes?
- Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
- Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
- Was the presentation well-paced? Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation, or did they rush through some elements?
- Was the presenter careful not to over-generalize their research?
- Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
- Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience's attention?
- Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact, vocal range, steady pace, and confident presence?
- Did the speaker's slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise?
- Did the contestant highlight successfully their individual contributions to the research?